Sunday, January 30, 2011

The Fourth Sunday after the Epiphany


The Very Rev. Anthony R. Pompa
Matthew 5:1-12

There is chaos and violence in the streets of Egypt. The ancient city of Carthage, known to us today as Tunisia, has seen similar oppressive violence as a response to voices protesting for democracy, equality, and economic opportunity. In Uganda, political tensions are rising, and recent attacks on activists for the rights of gays and on humanitarian workers seem to be an outgrowth of highly-charged political diatribe. In Sudan, the people of the south remain hopeful that voting for secession from the north will hold peacefully, yet violence has erupted and lives lost near the north/south border. Voices in the south clamor for peace and freedom, and in the north, carefully measured statements about a new Sudan are heard. In our own country, a new year brings again the voices of a path continuing forward in difficult times as we continue to struggle economically, and continue to live in a time where our country is at war.

In all of it, one can wonder and be lost, or even overwhelmed, in the dynamics of an unsettled time and unsettled world. In the midst of it all, we can respond to events as they impact our own lives and we can rightly wonder—what voices might we find clarity and action in following. One might also wonder, it all seems so big and we are just regular folk, what is my place in it?

This is the set-up I ask for us to live into this morning as we consider our Gospel today. In a world just as disrupted and challenged, I might suggest that common folk may have been asking the same questions. I am just a regular folk; what is my place in all this mess? Among the many voices crying out in this world, in which one might I find some clarity and action following?

Today we have the Beatitudes. Familiar to all of us, most scholars agree the beatitudes are the platform speech on which Jesus builds, inspires, challenges, and equips his followers to live into a new ideal for their lives and the world that is the Kingdom he has come to usher in. The symbolism in Matthew’s gospel is worth noting. Just as Moses ascended that holy mount to discover and deliver the law for the people of God, so Jesus sits on the mount to deliver the good news that God’s dream is actualized in Jesus, and to those who listen and believe in what he says, they must actualize his teachings in their behavior. In this way, God’s dream comes alive! “Blessed” is the English word we use to translate from the Greek “marikiori” which, more closely translated, may be “how fortunate” or “how fulfilled,” or in that sense, “happy.” “Blessed” are the ones who hear, believe, and live out this path that is not easy of bringing God’s dream to life in their lives and in the world.

This is a large and demanding voice with a call to big things. Who, then, is worthy of such a commendation? Who is there on that hillside? What about you? Can you imagine yourself on that hillside today? What is it that is being asked of them, of us? Surely those sitting there that day must have been spiritual heroes to actualize such behavior; surely this message today must be for the heroes among us.

Hear the words of Fred Beuchner as he responds to the questions, “What voices do I pay attention to, and how is it that a common folk like me fits into this? I paraphrase from his work on the Beatitudes found in his book, Wishful Thinking.

“We might be tempted to guess one sort or another of spiritual hero, (might be picked out to hear this special commendation that is beatitudes), men and women of impeccable credentials morally, spiritually, humanly, BUT we would be wrong.

“Jesus did not pick out the spiritual giants (to follow, listen, and to actualize) but the “poor in spirit,” the ones who spiritually speaking have nothing to give but everything to receive.”

“Not the champions of faith who can rejoice even in the midst of their own suffering, but the ones who mourn over suffering, and have the ability to mourn over the suffering of others.”

(Jesus did not choose) the strong ones but the meek ones, in the sense of the gentle ones, i.e., not like Caspar Milquetoast but like Charlie Chaplain, the little tramp who was stamped on by the world, yet is dapper and undaunted to the end, and somehow makes the world more human in the process.

(Jesus did not choose) the ones who are righteous but the ones who hope they will be some day and in the meantime, are well aware that the distance they have to go is still greater than the distance they have come.
(Jesus did not choose) the winners of great victories over evil in the world, but the ones who, seeing it in themselves every time they comb hair in the mirror, are merciful when they find it in others, and in being merciful maybe win the greater victory.

(Jesus did not choose) the totally pure, but the “pure in heart,” the ones who are as shop-worn and clay-footed as the next, but who somehow have kept some inner freshness and innocence intact.

(Jesus did not choose) necessarily the ones who have found peace in its fullness but the ones who, just for that reason, try to bring it about wherever and however they can, be it peace with their neighbors and God, peace and themselves.

Jesus saved for last the ones who side with heaven (on his account) even when any fool can see it seems to be a losing side in worldly terms. Looking into their faces he says, “Blessed are you.” “How fortunate you will be.” “Happy are you.”

Imagine them looking back at him. Now imagine yourself looking back at him. They are not a high-class crowd, peasants and fisher folk, on the shabby side, some of them, not that bright. It doesn’t look like there is a hero among them, Buechner reminds us. How about among us?

They are blessed—and they must know it as they go forward. It is not his hard times ahead he is concerned with but theirs. It is his own meekness, his own mercy, his own peaceful heart from which he speaks. It is their meekness, their mercy, their own peaceful hearts (and ours) that he seeks.

A final word on this day: If the Sermon on the Mount is Jesus delivering the platform of God’s dream and the opportunity is to hear the beatitudes as a commendation to actualize principles of mercy, meekness, peacefulness, and sacrifice, then we give thanks for Joel Atkinson’s ministry and person, for he is indeed “blessed.”

Amen.

Sunday, January 23, 2011

The Third Sunday after the Epiphany


The Rev. Canon Mariclair Partee

A few years ago, I had the opportunity to go on pilgrimage to Israel, and I found that if you go on pilgrimage to Israel with a certain kind of company, you will have all sorts of Biblical experiences. You can step into the Jordan River and re-experience baptism, not exactly where Jesus did it because that’s in the middle of the desert and doesn’t make for a good photo, but in a more picturesque area where there are thousand year old olive trees. You can cruise in a boat on the Sea of Galilee. You can see something called the Jesus boat which is a 2,000-year-old fishing boat, dredged up from the lake floor, that could possibly have been the sort used by Jesus and his disciples. You can even stop in at one of the numerous restaurants on the shore and eat Peter’s fish, a particular sort of fish that the owners assure you was the kind that Simon Peter was catching that day when Jesus called out to follow him. It’s all very authentic, assuming Jesus and the disciples had their own deep fryer.

A biblical experience that has authentically survived the millennia is the one we hear described in Paul’s letter to the Corinthians today. The newborn Christian church at Corinth is divided. Factions are forming around different individuals, and power struggles are emerging. Paul begins his letter by summoning the Corinthians to live up to their identity in Christ. In particular, Paul calls them to unity. He appeals to them in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ and, as New Testament scholar, J. R. Kirk, points out, we must not skip over this too quickly. The name of Jesus is not only the authority by which Paul calls this church to account, it is the name that makes the Corinthians one church. When Paul later asks, “Were you baptized into the name of Paul?” the obvious answer is no. We were baptized into the name of Jesus. Accordingly, the very basis of his admonition, the name of the Lord Jesus carries with it the diagnosis of their problem and its solution.

The problem is that they are claiming other peoples’ names as their identity markers. The solution is to be united in their common identity in Christ. To put it in another term, the Corinthians are plagued by party spirit. We get a hint at the divisions, even in the fact that one group is reporting to Paul about everyone else. Chloe’s people, who are, perhaps, Chloe’s household, or maybe those who meet for worship in Chloe’s house, bring word to Paul that the church is fracturing. Each group has rallied through a particular leader, and the debate in Corinth revolves around the knowledge and power that each of these teachers embodies. One group in Corinth has rallied to Apollos, an early leader under Paul and the Corinthian church. Elsewhere in the scriptures, Apollos is described as an eloquent man who is powerful in public debate, and such rhetorical force might have formed the rallying point for the Apollos party. It seems to lie behind Paul’s insistence that true proclamation of the Gospel does not require eloquence.

Then we have the place of Cephas, who is traditionally understood to be the apostle Peter, and his position is a bit murkier. It may be that Cephas or his followers introduced theological tensions in Corinth by bringing a sort of law-focused Christianity closer to its Jewish roots. The Corinthians, then, were flocking to smooth rhetoric that lived up to the days’ worldly display of wisdom and Apollos to a Jewish theology proclaimed by Cephas that seemed to have a stronger biblical pedigree, and to their own history, roots, and founder in Paul.

In response to this partisan bickering, Paul brings them back to the story that defines us all as the people of God, the crucifixion of Christ. Paul was not crucified for you, was he? Or were you baptized into the name of Paul? The answer is no, of course not. We are the people of Christ. Kirk reminds us that the cross transforms the value of our actions and our status. Because of the cross, we must learn to view the world differently. And so, as we start reading about the problems confronting the church in ancient Corinth, we will find ourselves invited to a conversion of the imagination, what Paul himself speaks of as being transformed by the renewing of our minds. Paul invites his readers to participate in the story of the cross, a narrative in which all that we think we know about the world, its values, its knowledge, its wisdom, its virtue, is reconfigured by God’s great act of salvation in Christ. The message of the cross, he is saying, is not something that only applies to becoming the people of God, something that can be compartmentalized and referred to only on questions of faith, or on Sunday mornings. It gives shape to the entirety of our lives and the entirety of our life together.

Now it was hard for me to read about the goings on at Corinth without immediately thinking of the state of affairs in our country and of the horrible events that occurred just over a week ago now in Arizona. Of course, no single public figure can be held responsible for the actions of an obviously troubled individual, but I think that there is something to the immediate blame that was placed on the tenor of our national debates. Every day, we are pulled in different directions by voices clamoring for our attention, claiming to represent the right beliefs, the correct way, the only truth. As divisions emerge in our political landscape, the rhetoric grows more passionate, more bombastic, and sometimes violent. Those who don’t agree with us are painted as lesser than us. Their humanity is stripped from them and they become a faceless enemy. It is any wonder, then, that this dis-incarnation can be taken to dangerous extremes, can provide a sense of justification for those who would inflict violence on those they despise.

As we are pulled in increasingly polarized directions by the voices of our politicians and commentators and critics and people in power, let our touchstone be the voice of Jesus in the Gospel today, calling out to us to follow him. Jesus did not eloquently call his disciples, nor did he promise them power or membership in an elite group. He simply invited these young fishermen to follow him, to pattern their lives on his commandments, to love God, and love neighbor, to have a conversion of the imagination, to be renewed. I think that invitation is before us again today. So let us follow him.

Amen.

Sunday, January 16, 2011

Second Sunday after the Epiphany

The Very Rev. Anthony R. Pompa

Surely you have heard that the entire world is off balance. You’ve heard that? As a matter of fact, folks are making lots of money right now writing books speaking to the reality that, at least on the level of the cosmos, we are in an unprecedented paradigm shift. Folks in church circles are also making lots of money writing books talking about what that means for the church. The truth of the matter is it is connected to the hole we have seen in the world in which we live to be living through a time of shift. This has never come so more evident than reading the front page of The Morning Call.

My element is the earth. My ruling planet is Saturn. The symbol of my life for 46 years has been the goat. My stone is garnet. As a good, old-fashioned Capricorn, my life pursuit has been to be proud of my achievements. My vibrant energy coming from the cosmos is powerful and resilient. My secret Capricorn desire is to be admired by family and friends, but who needed astrology to know that?

It seems that everything is off balance now. It seems my whole understanding of who I am, the signs that I look for in the sky, seem now to be pointing to a new truth. I am a Sagittarius, for God’s sake. I am not so sure about my element, the fire. I am so fond of Saturn as my guiding planet that I don’t know if I can give my allegiance to Jupiter. I have to tell you, there are some advantages to the archer as opposed to a goat, but my stone – I’ll never go turquoise. My life pursuit is to live the good life. I am not sure what that means, but it sounds good. The vibration for my new Sagittarian existence coming from the cosmos is overly expressive, leading to frequent burnouts. I have no interest in that. Ah, but my secret Sagittarian desire is to make a difference in the world. Maybe I’ll take that one.

OK, I’m making fun. For one thing, isn’t it amazing what one person in one small part of the world might decide on our behalf? That is that the cosmos has shifted and the paper publishes it all over, whatever. This is really a cheap way of taking astrology, that for which many look to the sky—you know what astrology is about. Astrology is about trying to find the signs that point to some piece of meaning in life. That is astrology. For some of us, it is frivolous and fun. For others, it is a bit more serious. For me, it’s frivolous and fun. My point, however, is that in all of humanity, we do share one thing. That is that we are all trying to make sense, find purpose, and find things with which we can align ourselves. We are often looking in places for the signs that will reveal these truths to us. This, I think, we all can agree on.

That is a long way of getting into John’s Gospel which, if you have ever studied John’s Gospel to understand what John is trying to tell us, revealed to us the truth that John is trying to convey to us. You have to understand that John is about signs. John’s entire Gospel is filled with signs. Signs, you know, are those things that point to something we cannot necessarily see or put our hands our hands on, but signs that point us to a truth about something. In today’s Gospel, we engage John’s first sign. That, of course, comes after his setting the stage, the theological and poetic stage. In those first 18 verses of the first chapter where John, in that beautiful poetry, tells us about God acting not only in the lives of individuals, but even more so, acting to come to redeem the entire creation, the entire cosmos. In John’s Gospel, God is hitting the “justify” button on the computer, resetting the stage. In today’s portion of that Gospel, John now translates that setting and begins to tell the real life historical story of how, indeed, God is pushing the justify button.

The sign that John gives us is, of course, in the person of John the Baptist. John makes the move to begin to tell the story of how the Word became flesh, it being rooted in the historical event in the person of one named Jesus, who one day walked across the wilderness and walked toward this figure, John. It is John the Baptist who John, the gospeler, chooses to tell us and point to the truth of what is happening. For John the Baptist, he will be the first signpost. You remember his words, not all that long ago in Advent and, of course, in Christmastide, when John says “I am not the light, but I have come to point to the light.” Well, today is the day. The light has walked into John the Baptizer’s presence, and he becomes the first witness in John’s Gospel because he sees the Holy Spirit descending and resting on Jesus like a dove. John points to the truth, he witnesses to it, and he announces to all who will hear it. What is this truth? This person is the Son of God. This person is the Lamb of God. John the Baptizer will be a witness and an announcer to a truth that is to be revealed, that God has come in time and in history, not only to redeem the cosmos, but also to deliver those who would hear him and receive him, and become children of God like him.

John’s Gospel announces to us today the code of discipleship that is to follow and bear witness to this Son of God, to this Lamb of God. To John’s audience, Son of God would have been a familiar term that they were expecting to hear and to see. It is one that they would hear, and know that God was acting in a particular way to bring a message of hope and freedom to a particular people. The Lamb of God, to an audience filled with Jews, certainly would have conjured up their knowledge and expectations that in that person, the way to freedom would be through sacrifice. This is the Son of God. This is the Lamb of God, and the entire rest of John’s Gospel would be about Jesus performing those signs, pointing to redemption. All those who would hear it would need to do is follow, and then witness to what they saw. So today in John’s Gospel, the sign points to that code of discipleship, to follow in witness the Son of God, the Lamb of God.

Here are the three things that I really want you to leave here with today. What does it mean to encounter this Lamb of God, this Son of God? These are the three things that I think it means that we are called to follow and then witness. Number one: All of us are in need of redeeming. All of us are in need of redeeming. Number two: We can’t do the redeeming. We just can’t pull off the redeeming. Have you noticed? Somehow, as hard as we might try, whatever program or campaign or statement or ideology we seem to come up with, we human beings, not just now in our time but forever historically, we can’t seem to get it all right. We can’t do the redeeming. Number one is admitting that we are in need of redeeming. Number two is that we can’t do the redeeming ourselves. The third thing is that once we encounter the one who redeems us, we must be a witness to that redemption.

Case in point: I was fortunate enough some years ago to spend a couple of days in study with Rabbi Ed Friedman, who was the incarnation of Family Systems Theory. (Actually he was the second generation of Family Systems Theory, but he is the one whom we knelt before to learn about Family Systems Theory.) In the class I attended, someone innocently asked Ed Friedman, “Rabbi Friedman, why do you think people come to church or to temple?” He said people come to church and to temple to show their home movies. Do you get that? What he is saying is that all of us take our humanity, we take our brokenness, we take our dysfunction, we take our sin, we take our failure, we take our hope, we take our joys, and we bring them to a safe place, and we show those movies on one another and on God. Sometimes that’s not so pretty. Sometimes it’s absolutely beautiful. You get it?

It’s been interesting to me to reflect again and to watch, which is what I do, reflect and watch our common response to the shootings in Arizona. If you pay attention to our national tragedies, if you pay attention to the home movies that are shown, isn’t the dialog that rises up around such events interesting? This isn’t the first time we have had a tragedy – it’s an awful tragedy, but it’s not the first time. If you pay attention at any tragedy, our response to it is to bring our home movies. That’s why, pastorally, when there are difficult things going on in our own personal lives, it is such emotional labor because all of our home movies come to be shown. Are you getting this yet? Isn’t it interesting that the dialog that occurs in the midst of a national tragedy raises things to which, perhaps, we need to pay attention? It’s not about what points people are making. It’s about what movies they are showing.

David Brooks, writing in his op ed piece in The New York Times in response to the shooting, showing his own home movies, perhaps offers us what I am really trying to get at. Making a statement about our common place that perhaps as a common group in our nation today, he is suggesting that perhaps what we need is to come to terms with our human limitations. Perhaps we are trying so hard to figure things out for ourselves that we are getting lost in our rhetoric and in our ideologies. Failing to name the reality, which is my point, a theological reality, we need redemption. All of us need redemption. We need to admit that we need redemption. We need to admit that we can’t do that redeeming on our own. We have tried, historically, and we have failed. When we come, you and I, into the realization that we hand our failure and our weakness and our sin over to a greater power than ours, then and only then, can we meet redemption. When we meet redemption, we need to witness to it.

David Brooks writes this about coming to that place of understanding our need for redemption: “Redemption is a tree with deep roots and without the roots, it can’t last.” So what are those roots? They are failure and sin and weakness and ignorance. I know it’s not Lent yet, but it seemed like today would be a good day to have it. We need redemption.

Tomorrow we will celebrate Martin Luther King, Jr. Day in our country. Tomorrow, in Sayre Hall, there will be a group from the Lehigh Valley who will gather in celebration, and I have been asked to say a few words at that celebration. The words that I have been asked to reflect on are about the progress of race relations in our country. I am not sure why I agreed to that, and I don’t know what I’m going to say yet, to be honest, other than we need redemption. All of us need a little redemption. We can’t do that redeeming by ourselves. For those of us who are people of faith, we must come to that place where we recognize the waters of baptism in which we have been baptized and know there is one who promises us redemption, and that admitting our weaknesses and our sin can only lead us to that place of redemption.

I tell this anecdote. As a young priest in Virginia in charge of my first congregation, somewhere in the mid to late ‘90s, you will remember that there was a rash of church burnings in the south, African-American congregations’ buildings being burned. I received a telephone call from an 80-some-year-old woman who was a member of the Presbyterian congregation down the road. I didn’t know her from Adam, but she invited me to a meeting at her house. Someone in my congregation advised me that this would be a good invitation to accept. So I went to the meeting and there I found myself sitting with three other clergy, me and this 80-year-old woman and three other clergy—myself, the Presbyterian pastor, the Methodist pastor, and the pastors and the deacons of the black Baptist church down the road. She looked at us and she said, “I have lived here all my life and I’ve lived in the south, and I’ve lived through much, and I’ve seen this movie before. They’re burning churches again. What are you all going to do about it?”

You see, we are in need of redeeming. We can’t do that redeeming by ourselves. When we come together, which is what we did, to name again before one another and God that we are in need of redeeming, that we can’t do that redeeming ourselves, and we invite the Lamb of God, the Son of God, to come with us and be with us, and to hand over our weakness and vulnerability, our prejudices and our sins, and ask for them to be redeemed. We are met there, by that Lamb of God, and then we are called to witness to it. In this scripture today, Jesus says to those who would listen, “Come and see,” just come and see. So I leave you with these words from Reinhold Niebuhr, “Nothing that is worth doing can be achieved in our lifetime. Therefore, we must be saved by hope. Nothing we do, however virtuous, can be accomplished alone. Therefore, we are saved by love. No virtuous act is quite as virtuous from the standpoint of our friend or foe, as it is from our standpoint. Therefore, we must be saved by the final form of love, which is forgiveness.”

Amen.